Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Relates to  MAGNOLIA-5284 - Getting issue details... STATUS

We have 3 distinct i18n "areas" in Magnolia:
* System: used for translations of Magnolia itself
* Content: localization of content (a site in multiple languages)
* Authoring: provides authors with means to translate their sites (relies on i18n-content)


Additionally, templates currently use the "system" components for some additional translations that are currently not handled by authors (such as "Read more" links)


Currently, the following packages exist:
* {{info.magnolia.cms.i18n}} (main)
* {{info.magnolia.ui.api.i18n}} (ui)
* {{info.magnolia.ui.framework.i18n}} (ui)
* {{info.magnolia.ui.vaadin.gwt.client.editor.i18n}} (ui)
* {{info.magnolia.cms.gui.i18n}} (legacy-admininterface)


The {{info.magnolia.cms.i18n}} package contains components for system and content. It also contains, i.e, {{Content}}-API based wrappers.
Additionally, info.magnolia.jcr.wrapper.I18nNodeWrapper is, well, in the wrong package; it should be packaged along the i18n-content features.


After an initial short discussion with [~pbaerfuss], we thought about having these 3 packages:
* {{info.magnolia.i18n.system}}
* {{info.magnolia.i18n.content}}
* {{info.magnolia.i18n.authoring}}
... but as shown above, we probably want to keep the differentiations between api, framework, .... Would {{info.magnolia.i18n.authoring.api}} and {{info.magnolia.i18n.authoring.framework}} work ? If we want {{info.magnolia.ui.}} as a parent to both, I'd favor dropping the {{.}} and using package names in a "single word", such as {{info.magnolia.i18ncontent}}.

TODO : use template below...

> The goal of this template is to remind you of many aspects that you could consider, to help you create a good concept. 
> Tip: Use whichever sections are appropriate for the concept, delete the rest, rename and add at will, these are simply a suggestion.
> Tip: Delete all these comments. 


The Problem

> AKA (Also known as): Starting Position
> Why is this concept being considered? What is the issue that someone is having that needs to be addressed? 


> This feature will be a success if it achieves these criteria.
> Tests could be defined based on these goals. 

Use Cases

> AKA: User Stories
> List concrete ways in which this feature will be used.





> AKA: Design
> What is the overall approach to solve the problem. First summarize  the high level overview in a few lines.


> AKA: Rationale
> Pros and Cons
> Consequences of this approach. 


> Describe concrete details of how the feature will be implemented. Could include class diagrams or interfaces.

> Requirements

> Thoughts

> Open Questions




> Possible Improvements

> Discarded Proposals

> Discussion

> References

  • No labels